Evidence that already exists when they ask
iVake records attendance, assessment, activities, publications and outcomes as they happen, so the submission is a report you run, not a term you lose.
89% overall readiness7 criteria6 open gaps
| Criterion | Data captured | Owner | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · Curricular aspects | 94% | Dean, Academics | 2 BoS minutes |
| 2 · Teaching & learning | 100% | Controller of Exams | — |
| 3 · Research & extension | 71% | Dean, Research | 18 publications |
| 4 · Infrastructure | 88% | Estate Officer | AMC records |
| 5 · Student support | 96% | Dean, Students | 3 activity reports |
| 6 · Governance | 82% | Registrar | Feedback analysis |
| 7 · Institutional values | 90% | IQAC Coordinator | 1 audit report |
Each percentage links to the records behind it. Opening a gap shows exactly what is missing and who owns it.
The IQAC workspace on a representative institution: readiness by criterion, with the gap and its owner.
One set of records, every framework that asks
Frameworks and portals change. The underlying facts — who taught what, who attended, what they scored, what the department published — do not.
NAAC, criterion by criterion
- Criterion-wise data sets and Self-Study Report support
- Every figure linked to the records it came from, not typed into a spreadsheet
Outcome attainment for NBA
- Course and programme outcomes (CO/PO/PSO) computed from the live grade book
- Attainment levels, gaps and actions updating as the term runs
AISHE, AICTE and university returns
- Generated from the same student record
- The number you file matches the number in your own system
Activities, kept whole
- Seminars, NSS, extension work and MoUs
- Proposal, attendance, report and outcome filed together, not across four inboxes
Student progression
- Placement, higher study, entrepreneurship and dropout tracked continuously
- Progression data cannot be reconstructed after the students leave
An IQAC workspace
- Owners, deadlines and the live gap against each metric
- Quality assurance as a standing job with names against it
NAAC has proposed a binary, yes-or-no accreditation, and has extended current accreditations while it prepares. The same records will still be needed, and a yes-or-no decision leaves no grade to soften a weak submission.
Accreditation frameworks and portals change. Always follow the current manual for your category of institution — this page describes how iVake holds the underlying data, not a substitute for the manual.
Where people go from here
Campus operations
- Where the records accreditation is built from come from
NAAC is moving to binary accreditation
- What to do while you wait
Training & placement
- Progression data, the hardest evidence to reconstruct
See iVake running on your own data
Share your fee structure and programmes before the call, or sample data with student names removed. We set them up, so you see your own institution on screen rather than a demo account.
- 45 minutes, your data. Not a generic tour of features.
- Migration mapped on the call. We show exactly where your current records land.
- A written rollout plan within two working days, with phases, owners and dates.
- No pressure to switch everything at once. Most schools and colleges start with one department or one intake.