OMR evaluation

A standard document scanner, or a multi-function printer with a document feeder, is enough for most institutions. For large bundles a dedicated scanner with a feeder is quicker. Where a campus has no scanner, sheets can be photographed on a phone.

Multiple marks and incomplete erasures are detected against a sensitivity you set. The sheet goes to a review queue where an evaluator sees the scanned image beside the detected marks and decides, and the decision is written to the audit trail. Clear sheets are marked without anyone opening them.

Yes. The answer key can divide a sheet into sections, each with its own marks for a correct answer, its own negative marking or none, and a setting for whether more than one option may be correct. This suits entrance and mock tests that mix question types on one sheet.

By a barcode printed on the sheet or a roll-number grid the student fills in, chosen when you design the template. If the barcode cannot be read, the roll-number grid is used; if neither can be read, the sheet is held for someone to identify.

Yes. Each set has its own answer key, and a set code on the sheet, bubbled or printed, tells the system which key to apply. Results are combined, and the analysis compares sets so you can see whether one was harder than the others.

For every question: how many students got it right, whether stronger students did better on it than weaker ones, and how often each wrong option was picked. Heads of department use it to drop weak questions, rewrite misleading options and balance the next paper, and the figures build up term after term.

Yes. Scores land in the grade book with internal assessment and written marks, so weighting, grade book locks, revaluation and results work as they do for any other assessment, and every change keeps its revision history.